TNA vs CAIQ overlap
10 institutions report holding both TNA and CAIQ.
TNACAIQ
Pick 2 to 4 ETFs.
We don’t have holdings for CAIQ. Most funds that aren’t in the SEC’s N-PORT data are unit trusts, grantor trusts or very new funds. The institutions tab may still have them.
10
institutions report holding both, of 148 holding any
TNA26.3% of its 13F dollars, 10.3% of its 97 holders
CAIQ5.3% of its 13F dollars, 16.4% of its 61 holders
Largest institutions holding both
| Firm | TNA | CAIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank of Canada | $18.5M | $403K |
| Chicago Partners Investment Group LLC | $10.4M | $2.3M |
| Millington Financial Advisors, LLC | $227K | $2.8M |
| Kingswood Wealth Advisors, LLC | $296K | $543K |
| Summit Financial, LLC | $487K | $210K |
| Osaic Holdings, Inc. | $87K | $239K |
| Morgan Stanley | $235K | $46 |
| Integrated Wealth Concepts LLC | $62K | $51K |
| Harbour Investments, Inc. | $52K | $10K |
| Wells Fargo & Company | $146 | $6 |
This compares who owns the funds, not what the funds hold. From SEC Form 13F, for managers with $100M+ in US securities.
Who owns them: TNA institutional holders, CAIQ institutional holders.
Frequently asked questions
Do institutions hold both TNA and CAIQ?
10 Form 13F filers report positions in both, out of 148 that report either one.
How is overlap by weight worked out?
For each holding the two funds share, take the smaller of the two weights, then add those up. Identical portfolios score 100%.